The Day Labor Research Institute

SOLUTIONS GROUNDED IN RESEARCH
Home     About Us     Contact Us     FAQ     Solutions     Research     News     Photos     Links      
News 

Arrests Made In Connection With Day Laborer Assaults

KGTV, 10News.com - San Diego,CA,USA August 14, 2007

SAN DIEGO -- Authorities announced the arrests Tuesday of two men and a woman suspected of kidnapping and robbing more than two dozen migrant workers in North County communities over the last several months.

Kevin Anderson of Vista and Escondido residents Nicole Couch and Thomas Malcolm Graham were taken into custody during two separate traffic stops Monday and Tuesday, according to sheriff's officials.

Since at least June, Anderson and Graham, both 22, and Couch, 25, allegedly have approached immigrant day laborers awaiting jobs and offered them employment.

The suspects would then allegedly drive one, two or three of them at a time to a remote location and rob them of cash and valuables at knifepoint.

One of the roughly 30 victims of the holdups, which occurred in rural sections of Encinitas, Escondido, Fallbrook, San Diego, San Marcos and Vista, suffered a minor stab wound, authorities said.

Investigators believe others have been victimized in the robbery series and urge them to report the crimes by calling the Vista Sheriff's Station at 760-940-4571.

The immigration status of anyone who comes forward will not be questioned, officials said.
 

Hypocrisy in Herndon: The anti-immigrant camp turns out not to have a better idea.

Washington Post Editorial, August 14, 2007; A12

IN THE ABSENCE of workable national policy, the debate over illegal immigration is riddled with hypocrisy. That hypocrisy is now on lurid display in Herndon, the little town in western Fairfax County that became a flashpoint in the national debate on the issue when it opened a day labor center in 2005, triggering an apoplectic response from the Minutemen and other anti-immigration forces. Last year, local candidates who opposed the center (and illegal immigrants) won a close election, took over the Town Council and vowed to shut the facility. But guess what: It turns out they didn't really mean it.

Herndon's experience is a distillation of the collision between ideology and reality in the immigration debate. Herndon's Town Council members denounced the use of taxpayer money to fund the worker center. No matter that the center's orderly procedures represented an obvious improvement over the chaotic daily scramble for jobs in a 7-Eleven parking lot that preceded the center's opening; Herndon officials pretended that barring illegal immigrants from the center was the principled thing to do.

But when Fairfax County called Herndon's bluff recently and announced that it would cut off funding for the center early next month, Herndon buckled. In a letter to Fairfax officials, Herndon Mayor Stephen J. DeBenedittis, who campaigned against the center, pleaded for an "amicable" settlement that would restore its funding, at least for the time being. His fear is that a shutdown of the center would force scores of job-seeking immigrants onto streets and parking lots -- that it would reinstate, in other words, the conditions that made the labor center necessary in the first place. The reality is that those conditions are not about to change, given a dynamic local economy and the demand for immigrant labor.

Some members of the Town Council continue to insist that the center can bar illegal immigrants. Three times in the past year, they've sought a new operator that would screen out undocumented workers. So far, no suitable candidate has emerged. What's more, Herndon officials now acknowledge that closing the center or barring illegal immigrants may undercut the town's ability to enforce an ordinance prohibiting employers from picking up day workers on the street. Tonight, the council will probably vote to allow the center to continue operating in some guise.

An average of 125 workers per day use the center, which operates seven days a week. A lottery system helps match laborers and employers. English classes are held daily. Charitable groups distribute food and clothing there. Aside from some grumbles about immigrants cutting through neighboring property to reach the center, there have been few complaints. Railing against the immigrants who use the center helped get the Town Council elected. Governing turns out to be a bit more difficult.

Exploitation or Opportunity? Lawsuit claims day laborers shortchanged
By Margo Pierce


What would you be willing to do for $33 a day? How about starting work at 2:50 p.m. and being your on your feet working until you clock out at 11 p.m.? Add in that your supervisor can't be bothered to give you breaks, so you have to pretend to be going to the bathroom in order to grab something to eat or get off your feet for a few minutes.

Then there's a mandatory $7 transportation fee -- you're not allowed to take the bus at $3 per round trip -- and all this after getting up at 7 a.m. to wait around to get the job that started that afternoon.

You might decide that's not worth $33. But if the only alternative is selling drugs or some other illegal activity, you suck it up and take your $33. Or do you?

Sixteen day laborers in Cincinnati are challenging that kind of treatment. A lawsuit in federal court accuses Labor Works in Cincinnati and Schwan's Food in Florence of violating the Fair Labor Standards Act. The laborers seek back pay, damages and attorney fees.

"I've been with Labor Works since '96, so I know how it works," says Damon Pearson, a day laborer and plaintiff. "You gotta go in early just to get your name on the list, and then you wait. If you worked the previous day, you're likely to work that day, but there is a little bit of favoritism.

"Then from 11:30 to 1:00, you're just waiting around on the driver. Driver's got an attitude. On top of that, you have to pay for transportation, whether or not you work. Shifts begin at 2:50 or 3:20. We're sitting in the (Schwan's) cafeteria until a shift starts and not getting paid."

All that waiting is an integral part of the job and ought to be compensated, according to Kelly Lundrigan, one of two attorneys who filed the lawsuit. He says the day laborers aren't free to go do something else and the employer benefits from having the workers ready to go the moment a shift begins. Because of the transportation arrangements, the Labor Works employees are "held captive" and not being paid, Lundrigan says. That's why the lawsuit claims back pay is owed.

'A lot of abuse'
If the assembly line at Schwan's breaks down, Pearson says, the workers can be left standing around with nothing to do or simply sent back to Cincinnati and don't receive any pay in either instance. Additionally, time in excess of 40 hours a week isn't paid at the legally required overtime rate, according to the lawsuit.

Another issue is mandatory fees the employees pay for transportation. The Labor Works Web site boasts "the elimination of 'no-shows.' " This is accomplished by requiring day laborers to ride the company's bus for $7 a day. The Web site neglects to include that piece of information.

"We provide transportation to and from your job site," the Web site says. "This allows us to guarantee that the number of temporary workers you ordered arrive in our company vans on time and in an organized fashion. Likewise, since the temps rely on us for transportation, they are less likely to be 'walk-offs' during the scheduled shift."

Pearson says the bus has inadequate heating, frequently breaks down and arrival/departure times are unreliable. He also questions the reason for the fee.

"That's $7 times 15 people times two buses," he says. "What are they doing with all that money?"

That's $210 per day paid to Labor Works by its temporary workers.

"The fact that they're required to use the transportation required by Labor Works is a system designed by Labor Works to benefit the employer," Lundrigan says. "It's an abusive practice."

But it's a common practice by day-labor companies, as is charging rent for such safety gear as protective goggles or clothing required by the employer, according to Curt Braymen. A board member for the Day Labor Organizing Project, Braymen and others are helping identify individuals who might want to join the lawsuit (www.volunteermatch.org/orgs/org59751.html).

"There's a lot of abuse," he says. "This isn't a unique experience -- it happens in at least six or seven day labor halls every day. We're going after Labor Works because the workers came to us."

Sean Fore, CEO of Labor Works, headquartered in Louisville, Ky., disputes the allegations but declines to answer questions.

"We don't think there's any merit to the lawsuit," he says. "We're going to let our lawyers make those responses in the proper venue."

The laborers, the Day Labor Organizing Project and the attorneys say they aren't looking for special treatment; they want to be treated fairly according to existing law.

"The Fair Labor Standards Act is a very fact-specific analysis to have to engage in under that statute," Lundrigan says. "There are lots and lots of legal exceptions and qualification to the law, and it's a very fact-intensive analysis to determine when somebody has to be paid for what type of activity. In this specific case, based on these facts, we believe these employers are legally required to pay these employees for the time that they are spending -- the time they're waiting to get to Schwan's, the time spent waiting in the Schwan's cafeteria. All that time, we believe they're entitled to be compensated for."

'Give us some respect'
Lundrigan calls the group of 16 plaintiffs "courageous" because of their willingness to speak out.

"The unfair illegal business practices, we think, are designed to prey upon the most vulnerable people in our community," he says. "They're people who want to work but are having a hard time making ends meet. Lawsuits can definitely be agents of change, as they have been in the past. I think this lawsuit in particular definitely has the capacity to change behavior."

Trying to get businesses to accept responsibility for practices that perpetuate unfair and illegal activity is difficult. A system of subcontracting allows large companies, such as Schwan's Foods, to ignore their culpability, Braymen says. He sees this as an increasing problem in this country.

"You go to Schwan's, they say, 'That doesn't have anything to do with us -- that's Labor Works.' Why would Schwan's use as many as 50 temporary people a day?" Braymen asks. "It isn't a case of supply and demand. It's becoming a trend in this country."

Lundrigan agrees.

"There's an economic incentive to do this," he says. "Economic efficiency is great. But this kind of abusive behavior should not be tolerated."

Schwan's Plant Manager Randy Ingolia didn't respond to a request for an interview, and Bill McCormack in the corporate office was unavailable for comment.

Based on his experience, Pearson doesn't think Schwan's Foods is racist -- they just look down on and abuse workers who are poor.

"I'm not perfect here," Pearson says. "But we're putting in our time and effort into working. It's hard and they treat us like crap. Give us some respect. We got people who want to work, who don't want to sell drugs or work in strip clubs. In Cincinnati we're cryin' for more jobs." ©

 

Printed from the City Beat website: citybeat.com
POSTED ON JUNE 6, 2007:

All in a Day's Work

An insider's view of how day laborers are treated

By Margo Pierce

Teenagers camping overnight on a sidewalk to get concert tickets aren't such a surprising sight. The popularity of Harry Potter books has made kids crowding sidewalks outside a bookstore late at night commonplace.

But getting up at 3 a.m. in order to be in line by 4 a.m. to put your name on a list at 4:30 a.m. for the possibility of getting a job that probably won't begin until 10 a.m. sounds ludicrous. Yet that is exactly what hundreds of unemployed and homeless people do in Cincinnati to earn money.

One of the places they go is Labor Works, a day labor hall in Walnut Hills where temporary workers are hired to do all kind of jobs. Companies contract with day labor halls for cheap, on-demand help with anything from construction to food preparation.

The plight of day laborers or "temps" is getting more attention thanks in part to efforts by groups that advocate for homeless and poor people (see "Job for a Day," issue of July 6, 2005). A lawsuit filed last month accuses Labor Works in Cincinnati and Schwan's Food in Florence of violating the federal Fair Labor Standards Act (see "Exploitation or Opportunity?," issue of April 25).

Now, after learning of the lawsuit, a former manager at Labor Works has come forward and offered to testify on behalf of the day laborers. James Thomas says he knows well the "mean" treatment the day laborers have to endure.

No free rides
Day laborers regularly deal with unpleasant working conditions because they frequently do the kind of work nobody else wants to do. But there are added indignities and aggravations in being a temporary worker.

Thomas started working for Labor Works as a driver in 2001, responsible for getting crews to and from workplaces. He was the labor hall manager when he left the company in 2003. He says he was so disturbed by the treatment of the day laborers that he quit and decided to be a stay-at-home dad.

"They're exploiting the misfortune for profit," Thomas says. "It's all about the money. It's about the contracts and retaining the business. For them, it's about all the other temp agencies. ... It's a bidding war, and the temps get caught between."

The competition sometimes translated into pressure to cut costs at the expense of workers, according to Thomas. Labor Works had a policy that second-shift workers would be driven to the place of their choosing after work, usually around 12:30 or 1 a.m., he says. The workers had to pay Labor Works $6 a day for a ride in a van to and from a job site.

"When I brought employees home from a job, I took my employees to their doorstep," Thomas says. "Wherever they needed to go, it was, 'Have a nice night. I'm sorry if it took too long to get you home.' It was supposed to be policy."

But the company pressured him to drop workers off in groups at a location convenient for the company, Thomas says.

"When my hours started to go into overtime they did not like it," he says. " 'Oh, can't you drop them off at a centralized location? If you can, get them on the Metro.' I actually had to pull in front of a few Metros to get them to stop so (workers) could spend another 50 to 70 cents to get a ride home."

Starting when the doors open at 4:30 a.m. until 7:30 a.m., workers sign up on a list to indicate that they're ready to work. There can be up to five sheets with up to 50 names on each, meaning 250 people waiting around in "the hall" to find out what jobs are available for the day.

The stated policy is that the first people on the list get matched up with the first available jobs, Thomas says. The temps are told that if they work one day, they're also likely to work the next day if a position is available: If you do a good job and prove yourself reliable, you'll earn another opportunity to work. It doesn't always happen that way, though, Thomas says. Complaints of favoritism are commonplace.

"There were occasional construction jobs that came along ... and those were the moneymakers because you may have a week assignment where you're making $24, $25 an hour," he says. "That's where the selection process was very biased -- and it stayed biased. You were told who you were going to take to that job site, and you were not allowed to tell anybody that this was happening."

Furthermore, mistakes on a job could prove very costly for the temps, resulting in a "punishment," Thomas says.

"That's where it goes 'off the list,' where there's no order to it," he says. "If you have someone last week that, say, made a mistake on a job ... they're not going: 'They messed up last week. They're not going out. I'm punishing 'em for couple of weeks.' So you have to ... tell the worker, 'Hey, you know, I can't send you.' This is crushing whoever is in front of you. ... This was their money for the day. This is their life."

'Like they're subhuman'
Thomas says he was criticized for being "too nice" to the temps. He describes the attitude of one of his superiors at Labor Works.

"When it comes to actually handling temps, he's very forceful," Thomas says. "He thinks that aggression is the only way you can get to 'those people' -- and I've heard him say that: 'those people.' He's been burned quite a few times as far as money. He's the one who told me, 'You don't give them anything. They're not gonna give it back, and you're dreaming if you think you're gonna get anything for giving them a little bit.' "

When his position was given to someone else, Thomas declined the offer of a different job, he says.

"I never looked at the temps as temps," he says. "They were people trying to make a little bit of money, and the only reason I could relate to 'em was because I've been homeless twice. I've been down with absolutely nothing in my pocket and what seemed to be no future in front of me. I couldn't -- and still don't -- understand how you could be mean to people who don't have anything, who have nothing to lose and all they have to look forward to is to come in and make a few dollars.

"They've had some bad breaks. A lot of them hit their one strike 20 years ago. They got in trouble one time when they were 18 or 20 years old -- just one felony when they were kids, and nobody will help 'em."

Thomas says some of the day laborers' problems were beyond his control. Sometimes drivers would forget to pick up workers, forcing them to spend the night at a job site. Sometimes workers wouldn't get their hours and/or supervisor's signature on their work tickets -- that meant they wouldn't get paid.

Temps who didn't work out would sometimes be left to wait all day for a ride.

"Where I would have gone and picked him up and talked to him and said, 'What's going on?,' " Thomas says, "(the superior) had more the mentality: 'Unless they're a danger to the contract that we have with the company, they sit there. They will be picked up when we have the time and urge to pick them up.' "

Thomas says he was earning $33,000 a year when he left his job at Labor Works. He says he valued the opportunity to help people.

"One of the success stories that will be stuck in my head forever is a gentlemen named Andrew," he says. "He was in one of the rehab centers here in Cincinnati. He and his (social) worker actually came in the day he started. She said, 'Listen, he's got drug and alcohol problems and I really want to get him on the right path. This is pretty much the only place we can go. Will you work with him?'

"And I said, 'Sure.' He worked with me for close to six months. He actually graduated the program and contacted his parents out in Minnesota and bought me a book and left it for me before he left to go to Minnesota. He was able to work, get clean and sober."

Thomas still has the book, inscribed, "Thanks for everything -- Andrew."

"If there is not a way for them to make honest money, what are they gonna do?" Thomas says. "You can go out and deal drugs right now. There's always somebody willing to give you something to sell. You may pay for it with your life if you can't sell it, but there's always something to do on the streets that's illegal. These people are trying to make a legal, honest living, and places like Labor Works have the tendency to treat 'em like trash, like they're subhuman."

Labor Works (laborworksusa.com) owns and operates 14 labor halls in Indiana, Kentucky, Minnesota, North Carolina and Ohio. Sean Fore, CEO of the company, and other company officials didn't respond to repeated requests for an interview for this story. ©

URL for this story: http://citybeat.com/gyrobase/Content?oid=oid%3A139531

 
Keeping the peace: Reports of confrontations between San Diego Minutemen, day laborers require increased law enforcement
Kristina Davis
SAN DIEGO UNION-TRIBUNE July 1, 2007

NORTH COUNTY – Every weekend, on a street corner somewhere in North County, San Diego Minutemen members face off against day laborers
and their supporters. Often, a police officer has been assigned to keep watch.


                              JOHN GASTALDO / Union-Tribune
Immigration-rights activist Claudia Smith stood
with day laborers
waiting for work on a recent Saturday at St. Peter's Catholic
Church in Fallbrook, which is a day-laborer pickup site.

Law enforcement officials say monitoring these emotional, politicized demonstrations is a necessity, as each side of the immigration debate repeatedly accuses the other of breaking the law or violating civil rights.

“Our job is to make sure we don't get involved in this emotionally at all,” said Encinitas sheriff's Sgt. Chuck Yancey. “Our job is to preserve the peace and preserve constitutional rights.”

At the very least, patrol officers periodically check on the scene as they drive from call to call.

Reports of heated confrontations have required some agencies to dedicate officers to day-laborer sites for several hours on weekends.

“It is taxing to our resources,” said Fallbrook sheriff's Lt. Alex Dominguez. “Especially in the Fallbrook area. We don't have a huge staff out here.”

Recently, sheriff's deputies have been working overtime Saturday mornings to keep the peace at the ARCO gas station on Mission Road in Bonsall, the latest hot spot for San Diego Minutemen activity.

With megaphones, signs and fliers, the anti-illegal-immigration activists try to discourage potential employers from hiring the day laborers, many of whom are believed to be illegal immigrants. A law enforcement officer is often present at such protests,



                                        JOHN GASTALDO / Union-Tribune
San Diego Minutemen members demonstrated in
the median of
the road, across from the church.
 

In turn, advocates for the day laborers videotape the Minutemen's actions and watch for civil-rights violations. They say many of the workers are legal residents.
A similar scene plays out almost weekly at day-labor sites around North County.

“It seems like, for the most part, both sides know what the ground rules are,” Dominguez said. “If not, when we arrive on scene, we explain that to them.”

The San Diego Minutemen is one of dozens of groups to emerge from the The Minuteman Project, a national movement that started in 2005. The group's platform, in general, is to demand border security and oppose illegal immigration.

In the past, Escondido police have posted officers at the Carl's Jr. at Mission Avenue and Quince Street, where day laborers and Minutemen members congregated in large numbers.



                   JOHN GASTALDO / Union-Tribune
Mike Spencer (left) and Dan Colandrea, both of Vista,
adjusted an effigy of a priest dressed as a devil to
show their displeasure with a Fallbrook church that
serves as a day-laborer pickup site.

 


“Just having a marked unit there we find prevents a lot of problems down the road,” Escondido police Lt. Bob Benton said. “People realize they're going to be held accountable for their actions.”

Day laborers and Minutemen members also frequent the Shell gas station on Encinitas Boulevard west of Interstate 5 in Encinitas, and in Carlsbad along El Camino Real.


Patrol officers periodically monitor activity at those sites, but increased police presence hasn't been necessary in recent months, law enforcement officials said.

The local confrontations reflect the contentious debate over immigration reform that has polarized the nation.

Congress has been unable to find common ground, and lawmakers all but killed a bill Thursday that would have created a guest-worker program, tightened border security and provided ways to give legal status to the estimated 12 million illegal immigrants already in the United States.


Tangles with the law
While the protests generally are peaceful, some participants have gotten physical.

Allegations of pushing, spitting and trespassing are common.

“Each side tries to entice the other to break the law,” Yancey said. “Both sides make accusations, but once you look into them, you find out they're just stirring the pot, trying to get us to bite on something.”

Charges have been filed in recent cases, however.

In March, a man affiliated with the Minutemen was charged with battery on two day laborers in an incident last year in Rancho Peñasquitos.

Prosecutors say John Monti took photos of the workers, called them insulting names and then punched one man who tried to walk away.

Monti is accused of then calling San Diego police to report that he had been robbed and assaulted by a group of migrant workers.

In January, a reporter from The Village News of Fallbrook was placed under “citizen's arrest” on suspicion of battering a 14-year-old girl during a peaceful Minuteman Project protest in Bonsall.

The reporter objected to being videotaped by the girl, grabbed the camera lens and shoved, the girl and her mother told deputies. The reporter pleaded guilty to two counts of disturbing the peace and was placed on three years' probation, according to court records.

Minuteman member Ray Carney of Fallbrook said physical encounters go along with the territory.

“I've been punched, spit on, been called all kinds of vile names,” Carney said. “If you're going to be an advocate and not expect to get injured, spit on and have drinks thrown at you, then you're in the wrong business.”

Members of the San Diego Minutemen, including founder Jeff Schwilk, are under police scrutiny in connection with the vandalism of three migrant encampments near McGonigle Canyon in Rancho Peñasquitos.

Schwilk and others being investigated deny any part in the Jan. 27 incident. San Diego police say the investigation is ongoing and no charges have been filed.

Recently, sheriff's officials received reports that some Minutemen members were attaching yellow lights to the roofs of their vehicles and following potential employers home.

“For the past several weeks, I've seen the Minutemen pull out all the stops,” said attorney Claudia Smith, an advocate for day laborers.

Two weeks ago, deputies watching a protest in Fallbrook quickly pulled over a Minutemen member who showed up with a yellow light on his beige sedan. He received a warning for the illegal light.

“We're just wanting everyone to be safe, that's our bottom line,” Dominguez said. “We're fearful someone might get hurt.”

Clashing with businesses
The San Diego Minutemen has recently accused the Sheriff's Department of being overly aggressive with enforcement.


“The other side – the ACLU observers – like to waste taxpayer money and police assets by calling these guys every five minutes and making up crime that supposedly we are committing,” Schwilk said at a Fallbrook rally. “We don't think that's very cool.

“Law enforcement is to be respected and used when needed, not as a tool for political statement,” said Schwilk, who wore a U.S. Border Patrol cap and U.S. Immigrations and Customs Enforcement T-shirt.

Businesses also call police when the action gets too close to their property.

Employees at Carl's Jr. in Escondido have complained to police about Minutemen activists and day laborers who refuse to get off the property.

Manager Diana Orozco said the restaurant has noticeably fewer customers when the Minutemen members are protesting outside.

“We tell them they have to move by the street,” Orozco said. “They put their signs on my property, and most people don't come when they see those signs.”

Many Minutemen members still are fuming over an arrest at the Bonsall gas station a few weeks ago.

Allen Huther was cited for suspicion of trespassing and obstructing an officer in an investigation after he refused repeated requests by ARCO employees and a sheriff's deputy to leave, authorities said.

ARCO has a corporate policy that prohibits videotaping on its property.

“This is strictly a safety issue,” said corporate spokesman Todd Spitler.

Spitler said the company hopes to continue working with law enforcement to ensure a safe environment for customers and employees.

A week after Huther's arrest, Carney was among a group of Minutemen at a protest in Fallbrook who said deputies were becoming heavy-handed in dealing with the protesters.

“The police are overkill,” Carney said. “Certain officers don't like to be here. They'd rather be doing something else than baby-sitting a bunch of protesters, and they get agitated. Because this goes on every week – in Bonsall, somewhere in the county areas, Vista – and they just don't like being here.”

Day laborers standing in front of the ARCO station in Bonsall said they didn't mind the increased police presence.

If anything, it helps protect them against Minutemen members who yell and chase awaypotential employers, some said.

“The police come to make sure we are outside the gate on the sidewalk, so we're not on private property,” said Joel, 44, a day laborer who declined to give his last name.

Officers who are used to dealing with people on both sides of the debate have come to realize that managing demonstrations takes a delicate touch.

“Tempers can get high on both sides of the issues,” said Escondido police Sgt. Brian Knodel. “With some folks there's a sense of frustration. Some people perceive us as trying to take one side or another. We're not here to take sides.”


The Low Risk From Immigrants: Off-Target Priorities For Homeland Defense

By Sebastian Mallaby, Washington Post
Monday, May 28, 2007; A17


Of the many infuriating assertions in the immigration debate, perhaps this one takes top prize: that we have to keep illegal immigrants out for the sake of our security. This notion is wrong, not just because undocumented workers are statistically less likely than native-born Americans to commit crimes or because they are serenely indifferent to al-Qaeda's teachings. It is wrong because it misses the most basic rule of smart homeland security.

Smart homeland security starts with the reality that you can't protect everything. The federal government alone spends more than $58 billion on homeland security per year -- a sum greater than the entire defense budget of Britain and about three times the estimated level of the pre-2001 homeland security budget. This spending has bought important gains: There are air marshals on planes, cockpits have been reinforced and so on. But the United States contains half a million bridges, 500 skyscrapers and 2,800 power plants, not to mention thousands of schools, shopping malls and subway stations. Even if you doubled spending and then doubled it again, there would be too many targets to protect. Total security is unattainable.

So the name of the game is prioritization. There are two schools of thought as to how this should be done, and neither of them involves clamping down on immigrants. The first school says: Figure out what sort of attack would cause the most damage -- for example, an attack on an urban chemical plant that would unleash deadly gases. The second school says: Figure out which attacks are most likely -- al-Qaeda has demonstrated a fascination with aircraft, so spending $9.16 per passenger on aviation security but only 6 cents for each mass-transit rider (as the federal government was found to do in 2004) may not actually be crazy.

Of course, both schools of thought are sometimes trumped by unschooled thoughtlessness. Last year the Department of Homeland Security was found to have a database of priority infrastructure that included Old MacDonald's Petting Zoo in Alabama, a bean festival in Georgia and the world's largest tinfoil ball in Ohio. The department's system for distributing grants has sometimes looked like a sick joke: In 2006 it cut support to obvious target cities such as Washington and New York in favor of Omaha and Louisville. But the good news is that these practices are widely understood to be absurd. A bill co-sponsored by Sens. Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama would allocate homeland security grants more rationally among states. Even Michael Chertoff, the homeland security secretary, has confessed that the grant-allocation system needs fixing.

Which raises a few questions about the immigration bill in Congress. If Clinton and Obama are upset with the misallocation of homeland security funds, why aren't they yelling about the proposed crackdown on immigrants? As a Post editorial recently pointed out, the immigration bill would require that the Department of Homeland Security hire, train and deploy 5,000 to 6,000 new border agents; recruit and support several thousand civilian employees required to fingerprint and register immigrants; build 370 miles of border fence; and create a whiz-bang database that would allow businesses to check whether a prospective employee has entered the country illegally. In a world of limited homeland security dollars, how is any of this a priority?

Immigrants come to the United States because they like it here, but it's not as though we don't have real enemies. If Congress wants to build fences, perhaps it should consider fencing off suspension-bridge cables that could be cut by terrorists. If Congress is in a hiring mood, perhaps it should pay for extra coast guards to enhance port security. Former Coast Guard officer Stephen Flynn has described how a ship more than three football fields long arrives each week in the Boston harbor; it is full of natural gas, and by puncturing its side with a powerboat-bomb, terrorists could cause an inferno that would melt the city's waterfront. This is not especially far-fetched. Al-Qaeda used a small boat to attack the USS Cole in Yemen seven years ago.

One of the distressing features of our times is the absence of any moral link between the troops who risk their lives abroad and our domestic priorities. In most past conflicts, Americans on the home front have made at least a token sacrifice: They have accepted higher taxes, cultivated "victory gardens," faced the possibility that a family member might be drafted. This time around, there is no war tax, no draft and no sense that ordinary peacetime indulgences ought to be questioned. Even when those indulgences divert the government's attention from people who would kill us.
 

Coalition: NY church lets day laborers use land for hiring site

By JIM FITZGERALD, Newsday

June 6, 2007

WHITE PLAINS, N.Y. -- An African-American church has turned over part of its grounds to be used as a day laborer hiring site in Mamaroneck, where the closing of an earlier site led to a successful federal lawsuit against the village, a Hispanic center said.

Bishop Wayne Powell, of the Strait Gate Church, agreed to let day laborers use more than half an acre of the church's property, starting next Tuesday, said Mariana Boneo, executive director of the Hispanic Resource Center.

"It was a remarkable and generous offer," she said Wednesday.

The workers, most of whom are Hispanic immigrants, will be asked to assemble there to meet with contractors looking for labor, and the site also will be used for English-language classes, safety workshops and other outreach, Boneo said. Two rooms in the church and a bathroom will also be available, she said.

Once workers, contractors and village residents get used to the new site, she said, "It's going to be organized, it's going to be orderly, it will offer a far more dignified way of doing things. ... The workers won't be out in traffic."

A federal judge ruled in November that the Village of Mamaroneck discriminated against Hispanic day laborers when it closed a hiring site early last year and stepped up police patrols on the streets when the workers moved there to look for work.

Judge Colleen McMahon asked both sides to come up with an appropriate remedy, and those discussions are still under way.

The president of the Hispanic coalition, John Gitlitz, said in an e-mailed statement, "The new day laborer site is a dream come true. Bishop Powell and his congregation truly live the Martin Luther King Jr. dream of equal opportunity for all."

A telephone call to Strait Gate Church was not immediately returned Wednesday. The Hispanic coalition said in its statement that the church, with a congregation of about 1,300 families, "was proud to reach out to the immigrants as part of the church's ongoing mission of promoting equal opportunity and social harmony."

Gitlitz said the coalition has already received financial grants to run the hiring site.


Copyright 2007 Newsday Inc.


Injured, Yet Uninsured: Immigrants struggle to adapt to U.S health system.
By Scott J. Krischke, The Connection

June 6, 2007

A single day can change the course of a person’s life. For Nelson, an undocumented immigrant living in Herndon, it was June 2, 2006.

The 39-year-old day laborer who settled in the Herndon area after arriving from El Salvador in February of 2005 was walking down the street to his former home on Blackthorne Square in Herndon. It had been a rough morning for Nelson, having not found any work yet for the week at the center.

But things quickly seemed to be turning around when he walked past a woman in front of a home on his street packing up some luggage to the back of her truck. When she signalled Nelson and his friend over to her house to help her stack and secure her belongings, the two jumped at the opportunity to make a few extra dollars.

While Nelson was strapping down the loose suitcases with a bungee cord, his temporary employer reached down and pulled at one of the linked cords a few inches from his face. With a quick, sharp twang, the two tightly notched hooks separated and the bungee cord ripped back.

"In that moment, I didn't feel anything, it was just like a quick hit to the face," said Nelson. "I stepped back, and all of a sudden I felt my head start to hurt and my body was getting very hot."

THE METAL HOOK of the bungee cord, stretched taught over the suitcases, had flown up and whipped Nelson directly in his left eye, tearing into his cornea and pulling out more than half of his eye.

His friend worked to comfort Nelson, who had gone into a daze. The paramedics arrived and took Nelson to Inova Loudoun Hospital.

"I just prayed to God that it wasn't something life-threatening," said Nelson. "I couldn't move, I couldn't see. I just remember the paramedics telling me to count to 10."

After nearly two days of intensive medical care, Nelson survived the initial injury and was able to keep what remained of his now non-functioning eye. What would follow would be more than six months of recovery and an attempt to navigate the labyrinth of alternative medical care options for the uninsured in the United States.

As he was not a legal resident of the United States, he did not qualify for government medical assistance or disability payments. The woman who had asked him for his help had left town, and she was not returning the phone messages that he left to her cellular phone, asking him to contact her. With approximately $15,000 already owed to the hospital for his brief stay and anti-infection medication, Nelson couldn't afford any more assistance without outside financial help.

He was not able to work in his condition. The regular monthly remittances that Nelson had been sending to his wife and 11-year-old son in El Salvador ended. He would soon be finding it difficult to pay for his rent and basic food necessities.

THROUGH THE HELP of his friend Martin Rios, assistant director of the Herndon Official Workers Center, paired with a large donation from his former construction boss in Centreville and the help of various local free clinics and charities, Nelson was able to pull himself up and restart his life.

A few months ago, he received a prosthetic eye to fit over his wound and he has once again started to earn enough money to sustain himself.

"I survived because of people like Martin, people like [my former boss], people from the churches and people who work in the community with workers," said Nelson. Still, without a steady job, due largely because of his residency status, he has not yet had the ability to afford to pay off his medical bills.

And Nelson now must deal with another major obstacle in his life and his ability to provide for himself and his family.

His body still adjusting to the prosthetic eye which has left him with constant headaches. As his work cannot be overly physical, he has been limited to finding jobs as a painter. He still does not know what long-term effects or infections could come as a result of his injury.

"Having both eyes, it's something that you need for your life, it's something that a normal person has," Nelson said. "I'll never be a normal person again."

NELSON'S CASE is not unique in the regional day labor community.
Every year, thousands of workers in the region are injured in some capacity while working in day labor positions and virtually all of them are uninsured, according to Rios. Typically, all but the most extreme cases go unreported, he added.

"Unfortunately the kind of job that workers not only at the [Herndon day labor] center but immigrants in general get are jobs that have a high risk of personal injury," said Rios.

That problem is compounded by the lack of access to public health safety nets and familiarity of the American health system due to the fact that many workers are not legal U.S. residents, said Jennifer Montgomery, executive director of the Loudoun Community Free Clinic. The clinic, which helped Nelson find treatment last year, works occasionally with workers recovering from injuries such as hernias and broken ribs.

"If you or I are injured on the job doing these things, we would be paid compensation until we can recover and continue our work," said Montgomery. "These folks don't have that luxury and at the same time they are expected to support families."

"A lot of times this can just lead to their injuries becoming exacerbated as they try and continue to work when in most cases they really shouldn't."

And when it does get to the point where it is unbearable, the workers show up to the emergency room and are saddled with large expenses that they cannot afford to pay, Rios added.

MOST OF THESE immigrant workers who do not have access to the health care they need, especially those without legal residency status, are forced to look to the non-profit sector for help, according to Fiorella Izquierdo a community worker with the Hispanic Committee of Northern Virginia. But those options are often inconsistent in quantity, she said.

"The amount of access to the services [in the non-profit sector] doesn't depend as much on the number of workers who need it but rather what they can afford," said Izquierdo. "And that can vary greatly from one year to the next." She added that her organization helps about five "seriously" injured day laborers each month.

Getting information available to the immigrant worker community and increasing salaries so workers can afford insurance are the only ways to improve the region-wide immigrant health care access crisis, Izquierdo and Rios said.

"The best thing to improve this is to work to get these people legal [residency status]," said Izquierdo. "As residents, they will have more access to better pay, to the jobs that will provide them with insurance, to the social programs."

"If we cannot come upon a solution to increase the information out there and get more people the help they need," Rios said, "we're not going to be able to improve our lives and continue moving forward."


All in a Day's Work: An insider's view of how day laborers are treated
BY Margo Pierce, City Beat | 06/06/2007 
 
Teenagers camping overnight on a sidewalk to get concert tickets aren't such a surprising sight. The popularity of Harry Potter books has made kids crowding sidewalks outside a bookstore late at night commonplace.

But getting up at 3 a.m. in order to be in line by 4 a.m. to put your name on a list at 4:30 a.m. for the possibility of getting a job that probably won't begin until 10 a.m. sounds ludicrous. Yet that is exactly what hundreds of unemployed and homeless people do in Cincinnati to earn money.

One of the places they go is Labor Works, a day labor hall in Walnut Hills where temporary workers are hired to do all kind of jobs. Companies contract with day labor halls for cheap, on-demand help with anything from construction to food preparation.

The plight of day laborers or "temps" is getting more attention thanks in part to efforts by groups that advocate for homeless and poor people (see "Job for a Day," issue of July 6, 2005). A lawsuit filed last month accuses Labor Works in Cincinnati and Schwan's Food in Florence of violating the federal Fair Labor Standards Act (see "Exploitation or Opportunity?," issue of April 25).

Now, after learning of the lawsuit, a former manager at Labor Works has come forward and offered to testify on behalf of the day laborers. James Thomas says he knows well the "mean" treatment the day laborers have to endure.


No free rides
Day laborers regularly deal with unpleasant working conditions because they frequently do the kind of work nobody else wants to do. But there are added indignities and aggravations in being a temporary worker.

Thomas started working for Labor Works as a driver in 2001, responsible for getting crews to and from workplaces. He was the labor hall manager when he left the company in 2003. He says he was so disturbed by the treatment of the day laborers that he quit and decided to be a stay-at-home dad.

"They're exploiting the misfortune for profit," Thomas says. "It's all about the money. It's about the contracts and retaining the business. For them, it's about all the other temp agencies. ... It's a bidding war, and the temps get caught between."

The competition sometimes translated into pressure to cut costs at the expense of workers, according to Thomas. Labor Works had a policy that second-shift workers would be driven to the place of their choosing after work, usually around 12:30 or 1 a.m., he says. The workers had to pay Labor Works $6 a day for a ride in a van to and from a job site.

"When I brought employees home from a job, I took my employees to their doorstep," Thomas says. "Wherever they needed to go, it was, 'Have a nice night. I'm sorry if it took too long to get you home.' It was supposed to be policy."

But the company pressured him to drop workers off in groups at a location convenient for the company, Thomas says.

"When my hours started to go into overtime they did not like it," he says. " 'Oh, can't you drop them off at a centralized location? If you can, get them on the Metro.' I actually had to pull in front of a few Metros to get them to stop so (workers) could spend another 50 to 70 cents to get a ride home."

Starting when the doors open at 4:30 a.m. until 7:30 a.m., workers sign up on a list to indicate that they're ready to work. There can be up to five sheets with up to 50 names on each, meaning 250 people waiting around in "the hall" to find out what jobs are available for the day.

The stated policy is that the first people on the list get matched up with the first available jobs, Thomas says. The temps are told that if they work one day, they're also likely to work the next day if a position is available: If you do a good job and prove yourself reliable, you'll earn another opportunity to work. It doesn't always happen that way, though, Thomas says. Complaints of favoritism are commonplace.

"There were occasional construction jobs that came along ... and those were the moneymakers because you may have a week assignment where you're making $24, $25 an hour," he says. "That's where the selection process was very biased -- and it stayed biased. You were told who you were going to take to that job site, and you were not allowed to tell anybody that this was happening."

Furthermore, mistakes on a job could prove very costly for the temps, resulting in a "punishment," Thomas says.

"That's where it goes 'off the list,' where there's no order to it," he says. "If you have someone last week that, say, made a mistake on a job ... they're not going: 'They messed up last week. They're not going out. I'm punishing 'em for couple of weeks.' So you have to ... tell the worker, 'Hey, you know, I can't send you.' This is crushing whoever is in front of you. ... This was their money for the day. This is their life."

'Like they're subhuman'
Thomas says he was criticized for being "too nice" to the temps. He describes the attitude of one of his superiors at Labor Works.

"When it comes to actually handling temps, he's very forceful," Thomas says. "He thinks that aggression is the only way you can get to 'those people' -- and I've heard him say that: 'those people.' He's been burned quite a few times as far as money. He's the one who told me, 'You don't give them anything. They're not gonna give it back, and you're dreaming if you think you're gonna get anything for giving them a little bit.' "

When his position was given to someone else, Thomas declined the offer of a different job, he says.

"I never looked at the temps as temps," he says. "They were people trying to make a little bit of money, and the only reason I could relate to 'em was because I've been homeless twice. I've been down with absolutely nothing in my pocket and what seemed to be no future in front of me. I couldn't -- and still don't -- understand how you could be mean to people who don't have anything, who have nothing to lose and all they have to look forward to is to come in and make a few dollars.

"They've had some bad breaks. A lot of them hit their one strike 20 years ago. They got in trouble one time when they were 18 or 20 years old -- just one felony when they were kids, and nobody will help 'em."

Thomas says some of the day laborers' problems were beyond his control. Sometimes drivers would forget to pick up workers, forcing them to spend the night at a job site. Sometimes workers wouldn't get their hours and/or supervisor's signature on their work tickets -- that meant they wouldn't get paid.

Temps who didn't work out would sometimes be left to wait all day for a ride.

"Where I would have gone and picked him up and talked to him and said, 'What's going on?,' " Thomas says, "(the superior) had more the mentality: 'Unless they're a danger to the contract that we have with the company, they sit there. They will be picked up when we have the time and urge to pick them up.' "

Thomas says he was earning $33,000 a year when he left his job at Labor Works. He says he valued the opportunity to help people.

"One of the success stories that will be stuck in my head forever is a gentlemen named Andrew," he says. "He was in one of the rehab centers here in Cincinnati. He and his (social) worker actually came in the day he started. She said, 'Listen, he's got drug and alcohol problems and I really want to get him on the right path. This is pretty much the only place we can go. Will you work with him?'

"And I said, 'Sure.' He worked with me for close to six months. He actually graduated the program and contacted his parents out in Minnesota and bought me a book and left it for me before he left to go to Minnesota. He was able to work, get clean and sober."

Thomas still has the book, inscribed, "Thanks for everything -- Andrew."

"If there is not a way for them to make honest money, what are they gonna do?" Thomas says. "You can go out and deal drugs right now. There's always somebody willing to give you something to sell. You may pay for it with your life if you can't sell it, but there's always something to do on the streets that's illegal. These people are trying to make a legal, honest living, and places like Labor Works have the tendency to treat 'em like trash, like they're subhuman."

Labor Works (laborworksusa.com) owns and operates 14 labor halls in Indiana, Kentucky, Minnesota, North Carolina and Ohio. Sean Fore, CEO of the company, and other company officials didn't respond to repeated requests for an interview for this story.



Diary of a Day Laborer: A human drama in 5 parts

By Gustavo Arellano, Orange County Weekly.
Thursday, August 16, 2001 - 12:00 am


PROLOGUE

I once worked for a World War II vet who lost his leg in combat. Everyone always has these stereotypes that old white people are the most racist, but he was the best employer I ever had. He paid good, treated me and my friends with respect, bought us hamburgers for lunch, and even let us eat in his air-conditioned office so that we wouldn’t have to bake in the sun. He suffered a lot through life and, although I never lost a limb, I think he could relate to us. People who have suffered throughout life relate very easily.

—"Tio,"53


No matter what you’re doing, you run. It doesn’t matter if you’re 100 feet or just two feet away, you run. Your life depends on it. Your life depends on a random stranger who could kill you, will probably disrespect you, and most likely will pay you much less than you deserve. But even those prospects are better than the ones you used to have. This is the life of los jornaleros—the day laborers. Best known for standing around on street corners looking for work, their life actually consists of running, figuratively and literally. Running from a life of poverty toward the promise of America that comes in the form of the bluest blue-collar work. Running from the danger of la migra and toward employers who are absolute strangers with a car, some work and some cash.

Even if the bulk of the jornalero’s day is sedentary—i.e., hanging around a street corner, waiting for work—he must always be prepared to run. His day is constant anticipation. As I discovered over the course of three days as a day laborer, not running fast enough is the difference between a day of work and a day of painful waiting.


DAY 1: THE CHINESE MEXICAN

I worked for a couple of years at a factory, but they paid badly, and the conditions were horrible. You do the same thing over and over, get paid shit, and break your back for the same fucking wages regardless of how you do the job. Here, you can make much more than in a factory or in a restaurant. Yeah, it’s hard work, but I do something different every day. But I have to do it good. If not, I don’t work.

—Miguel, 31


I arrive around 11 a.m. outside a Home Depot in a shopping plaza on Brookhurst and Crescent. It’s one of Anaheim’s main gathering places for day laborers. Some of the few men remaining—maybe 20 altogether—have been waiting for work since 6 a.m.; by 10 a.m., most of the hiring is done; by 11 a.m., waiting for work is hoping against hope.

It’s obvious I do not belong here, no matter how hard I try to fit in. I have the right outfit: shoes caked with dust, the thinnest T-shirt I own, battered work pants, and a hat that will be my only protection against the unforgiving sun. But I wear glasses. My hands are smooth and show no sign of hard labor. And my skin, while somewhat dark, owes its tan to indoor lighting.

Which explains what happens next: as I approach the day laborers, they think I’m looking for workers, not for work. A man wearing a soccer jersey approaches.

"You need one worker?" he asks me in English.

"¿Mande?" I ask—What?

A perplexed look crosses his face. He wasn’t expecting Spanish.

"Are you looking for workers?" his friend asks me, this time in Spanish.

"No," I reply, again in Spanish. "I’m looking for work. You guys think I’m some pinche gabacho?"—a fucking white guy?

Everyone laughs. The tension is erased.

"Nah," he replies. "We thought you were Chinese."


"I knew that you were born here," one man tells me proudly after I reveal that I was born in the States and, yes, graduated from high school. "Ever since you first walked over here. You can tell if people were born here by the way they walk." People "from here" walk more stiffly—supposedly. The men I speak to—all in their mid-30s—are curious: Why would an American-born Mexican with a high school education have to stand on street corners to find work?

I don’t tell them I also graduated from college and am on my way to grad school. I act like they do. I don’t use English at all, instead employing the singsong Mexican Spanish of the rancho punctuated with graphic swear words to make my points.

I also ask questions that establish me as naive. An older gentleman, noting my inexperience, offers advice. His name is Julian. He’s a 47-year-old immigrant from Guerrero who has been working without papers for more than 20 years and is still looking to improve his life. "I’m going to computer classes to learn how to use a computer," he tells me proudly. "I recently bought a computer for my daughters who are in college to do their homework, but I also want to learn how to use it."

Julian shows me the finer points of getting a job in an environment in which work comes to those who run. He talks to me in an offhand manner, almost out of the side of his mouth, as he scans the street.

"You have to present a certain self-image," he says. "A lot of these guys"—he indicates the others talking in small clusters—"they want to work, but it doesn’t seem like it to prospective employers when they’re standing around talking to one another. You have to be on the lookout all the time for work. Every person that passes by, every car, is a prospective employer."

"But how do I know which people are actually looking for workers and which ones aren’t?" I ask.

Julian looks directly at me, as if he is about to impart ancient wisdom. "Sometimes, the people are shy, and you have to approach them," he replies. "Other times, they’ll be more direct. Regardless, when they come, you run toward them like a motherfucker."

I stick around until two in the afternoon. No one comes, and by then, I am one of the last jornaleros remaining. Men are returning from a full day of work, dirty but grinning. I notice that most pick up their transportation at the bicycle rack at the nearby Carl’s Jr. As I drive home in the Camry that I parked far away, I feel spoiled.


DAY 2: THE MANIC HISPANIC

People who hire us don’t care about legality or who has papers—and neither do the cops. All they want are people who can do the job at a much cheaper wage than a professional. They want to save the most money possible. That’s why the police or the companies around here don’t care. They’re in on it, too.

—anonymous, 18, Mexicali


A Silverado enters the parking lot and is immediately surrounded by about 15 men. Just as quickly, one man climbs into the truck and shakes hands with the driver, an older white man who apparently knows him. There’s nothing special about the worker, a guy with a scruffy beard and a hat that says, "Spice Girls." The men surrounding the truck begin yelling, "How many workers?" and, "What kind of work?" But the driver waves them off. "Sorry," he says. "I don’t need anyone else. Maybe tomorrow."

I arrive at 8 a.m. Around 40 men occupy what they refer to half-jokingly as their oficina—their office—a sidewalk across the street from Home Depot. By unwritten agreement between the jornaleros, the police and nearby businesses, the sidewalk is the only area where men can look for work in the shopping center. No wandering around the parking lot. No hanging around inside the stores. The sidewalk is about four feet wide and a parking lot in length. But all the men gather on the first 100 feet next to Brookhurst, where vehicles bound for Home Depot—and therefore the possibility of work—first enter.

The oficina operates like any office tower. For lunch, the men avail themselves of the Chinese restaurant or Carl’s Jr. or the father-daughter team that comes around 11 a.m. selling peanuts, pumpkin seeds and CDs. Someone has tied around trees plastic bags that serve as trash cans to make sure no one litters. Bathrooms are located inside the Carl’s Jr., which also serves as an air-conditioned haven—if you have the money—from the brutal heat that is just beginning.

Most of the men spend most of each day waiting. To pass the time, they chat among themselves or just stare intently at the street. Everyone tries to squeeze into the minimal shade cast by a large sign and a few scrawny trees. Even in the early morning, the sun burns us all.

The minute a car passes, everyone employs the same tactic: they rush to the edge of the sidewalk and lift their hands, trying to catch the driver’s attention. They shout out their specialty or just the word "Work!" The negotiation lasts two seconds as a car passes or stops to pick up someone. But mostly, the cars drive on. When they do, the jornaleros go back to waiting for the next prospective employer. Sometimes that could be hours away.


Friends who’ve worked in retail say humans—or at least consumers—are tied together like some multicelled organism, that we all show up in theaters and grocery stores or whatever en masse, leave together, and then return. Crowds flow. So does work. At 11:30 a.m., a line of cars pulls in looking for workers. I rush each car, but work goes to the swiftest. This is proved again and again. As soon as he picks a worker, the driver tries to leave, but all the men surround the vehicle, begging the driver for work. The drivers usually say courteously that they don’t need any more workers. But sometimes, they delight in bringing more misery to the life of the jornalero.

Case in point: a van stops in the middle of the street. The driver is a Latino—a conservative one, judging by the copy of National Review on the passenger seat. We swarm the van, but he angrily tells the laborers to go away.

"Is there a Manuel around?" he asks. "I’m looking for a Manuel." He speaks in English that is only slightly better than that spoken by the workers.

"He’s not here—hire us," one guy tells the driver.

"No, I want Manuel," the driver replies. "He does a good job."

A younger man forces his way through the crowd to the passenger-seat window and boldly proclaims he could do better than this Manuel, whoever he is.

"Oh, yeah? What can you do?" the driver asks him in Spanish.

"Anything," the boy confidently replies.

"Can you drywall?" the driver asks.

"Of course I can," the boy replies.

"What’s drywall, then?" the driver asks.

The boy begins to explain, "It’s when you put stucco inside the house . . ."

But the driver rudely cuts him off. "Sorry, you put stucco outside the house," he arrogantly replies.

Manuel finally emerges from the mass of men, gets in the van and leaves.

The young boy answered correctly—in Mexican Spanish, you do indeed call drywall "stucco." But the driver was listening for terms that only someone professionally trained would use, and most day laborers have probably never been professionally trained. Or perhaps he just delighted in tormenting someone.

I talk to the rejected worker, a 19-year-old whose name I never catch. The men here care more about what Mexican state you’re from, and I find out he is from the city of Toluca, just outside Mexico City. He has been here one week and has no relatives or friends in Orange County. The only thing the tolucense has done besides search for work is pay $175 per month upfront for the right to sleep on a woman’s couch.

Although he has just arrived, he already understands the rules of this workplace. "You have to be the first person to talk to the [employers] or you’re screwed," he says bitterly. "Every time a car comes, people circle it, and the driver cannot pick someone based on true talents or work ethic. He usually picks whoever came first. There’s no order, and we end up screwing one another because we surround cars." What’s worse, he says, is that he knows no one.

Day labor is pretty much like work anywhere in at least one respect, though: the more people you know, the better your chances.

"A lot of people that come looking for workers want someone who has already worked for them," the tolucense tells me. "And if that worker has a friend, the employer will pick the friend based on his word. If you don’t have a friend here, it’s nearly impossible to find work."

I have no blue-collar skills, nor do I have any friends here who can hook me up. This explains why I am unable to find work and probably explains his bad luck. He is I—although I am just pretending to do what he depends on for his survival. His backpack filled with various impressive-looking tools suggests he has real skills.

Watching him close up his bag and turn back to the street, I think, "If I were really in his situation, I would probably be homeless." That thought has not left my mind.


DAY 3: WHITE PEOPLE RULE

You have to be there constantly. I go there from eight in the morning and am usually the last person to leave. Some people start leaving at the lunch hour; I leave at 4 p.m. Maybe I didn’t get work today, but maybe somebody saw me standing there for a long time and they’ll remind themselves, "That person wants to work, and next time I see them, I’ll hire them just because they stood there for such a long time."

—unnamed immigrant, 29, Jalisco


"They sure know how to enjoy life," an older man says sarcastically as four Anglo men run around the block with their shirts off. Day laborers do not enjoy the luxuries of fashion, health-consciousness and other problems unique to middle-class life. Their lives depend on waiting, out-standing—literally standing longer than others—and running fast. According to a 1999 study by Dr. Abel Valenzuela of UCLA’s Center for the Study of Urban Poverty, about 20,000 day laborers operate in more than 90 sites in the Los Angeles/Orange County area. Almost all of them—98 percent—are from Mexico or Central America, and about 95 percent of these entered the country illegally; most of them remain without papers. Half the workers surveyed said employers had abused them at least once, usually in the form of nonpayment or insufficient payment. Fully half of them have been doing this for more than 10 years. The other half have been doing it for less than one year, suggesting that a large portion of workers—like the tolucense—are recent immigrants living lives as tenuous as his.

These men are workers, plain and simple. They might have personal lives, but their existence revolves around finding work, no matter how long it takes.

"You can never lose hope," says one gentleman, whose choice of a Mighty Ducks hat and a Kings T-shirt attests to his unconcern with sports rivalries. "I was once underneath the shade, the only person left, and was about to leave until I heard a honk. ‘You want to work?’ the guy asked me. Of course I did. I worked for five hours and received $60 for an easy job."

His story is interrupted. As he’s speaking, everyone starts pointing toward the street. I have let my guard down; a truck has arrived. I rush to find work. I can’t see the driver, but the men start shouting, "¡És un chino!"—he’s Chinese.

What difference this makes does not occur to me until a guy tells me afterward. "White people are the best [to work for] because all they ask is that you do the job right and they’ll pay you," he says. Chinese, the catchall phrase in Mexican Spanish for Asians, "are more demanding, and they pay cheap."

Prospective employers usually act nervous. They’ll slowly drive down the street, probably debating whether they should stick to their anti-immigrant rhetoric or hire cheap help. Then they’ll pull into the parking lot after making a couple of circles, still debating their hypocrisies.

But the chino manifests authority, as if he has done this many times before. "I give eight hours, $8," the man says in broken English. "Three workers. Construction."

A clamor breaks out among the men. "$10, two workers," one man shouts.

"No, eight," the Asian holds steadfastly. "Eight hours, I guarantee."

He picks a guy with a ponytail, who immediately asks the old man to hire his two friends. "Who are your friends?" the old man asks. Everyone shouts, "Me, me!" but the ponytail guy picks his friends and they get in the truck.

Those who remain try to shrug off their disappointment. "$8? That’s too little," one says. "I’m sure I can find someone who pays more later on."

Though the rejected men are devastated, the chosen are transformed. It’s an amazing and heartbreaking contrast. The chosen jornaleros’ faces are full of life, and they always start small talk with the person who selected them. Although the job will probably be backbreaking and they will no doubt be paid badly, anyone who remains on the sidewalk would kill to trade places.

There is no such thing as "unskilled workers" here. Everyone has a specialty—drywalling, construction and its myriad requirements, gardening. Some can do everything. But woe to the man without a skill. He is never picked.

I am never picked. As I leave the sidewalk for lunch around 1 p.m., the irony does not escape me: I am college-educated, young, and sound of mind and body. But in this world, any of these men has more to offer a prospective employer than I do.


EPILOGUE

I always try to help others out. Sometimes, a person will come with a job that I cannot do. But maybe I know someone there that can do it. I’ll yell out to the person that they have a job there. Sure, there’s competition for work here, but I’d rather make sure that others get a job I can’t do than leave that job unfilled and deny someone their day’s wages.

—"El Pansón" ["the Guy With the Huge Gut"], no age given, Michoacán


"So do you want to work or not?"

Leaving for lunch put me in a perfect position to get to a truck before anyone else. I immediately ask the lady driver what type of work she has. She is looking for people to pull weeds in her garden, something even I could do.

Here, at last, is an opportunity to work eight hours at $10 per—a king’s income here. I flash through the advantages of saying yes, but I refuse the job. It wasn’t the weeding; I’ve been pulling weeds all my life and know the basics of front-yard horticulture. But I can’t bring myself to take the job. I would be robbing these men of money they need to survive, especially one that pays this well. I walk away as others crowd around, a few of them winners in this rudest lottery.


Sure, it’s a hard job, but I suffer through it to show my children what type of life not to have. Lots of Americans, they’ve been here forever: their parents, grandparents, great-grandparents, and so forth. They’re used to a life of luxury. If a little kid breaks his toy, he just waits until his parents come home so they can buy him a new one and throw the broken one away. We immigrants, on the other hand, come from a life of hardship. We appreciate the United States more than gabachos. All of us here, we just want to work.

—Enrique, 38

 


KKK usurps protest
Minuteman group calls off rally
03/31/2007
By Sahra Susman

Inland Valley Daily Bulletin RANCHO CUCAMONGA -
An illegal-immigration protest organized by the Minuteman Project on Saturday morning was foiled by the arrival of members of the Ku Klux Klan.

About 10 members of the white-supremacist group showed up at Arrow Highway and Grove Avenue and proceeded to shout chants and wave an American flag. Some members wearing black T-shirts emblazoned with the KKK insignia concealed their identity with bandanas and sunglasses.

One man identified himself as a member of the White Legion Knights of the Ku Klux Klan from Yucaipa.

KKK members said they were at the protest to support the Minuteman Project but refused to comment further.
Minuteman Project National Rally spokesman Raymond Herrera said his group of about 40 members decided to leave shortly after the KKK showed up.

Herrera said Minuteman Project members did not invite the KKK and would no longer post the dates of protests on its Web site.

"We don't approve of standing anywhere near the KKK - they're not with us," said Herrera, a Mexican-American from Victorville. "We're a multi-ethnic group. We don't believe in racism, and when the Nazis show up we cancel the rallies immediately. We do not intermingle and we do not believe in their philosophy."

San Bernardino County sheriff's deputies and Upland police officers monitored the protest. No arrests were made.
The agencies did confirm reports were made that KKK members were in attendance.

But when Minuteman Project members left, the protest at the intersection didn't stop.

More than 100 day laborers and affiliates counter-protested in front of Arrow Grove Market. The noisy group focused their attention on the KKK and other remaining protesters, which numbered less than 20.

For about three hours, protesters from all sides of the immigration debate - and the intersection - chanted and shouted at each other as well as passing vehicles.
The intersection at Arrow and Grove divides Rancho Cucamonga and Upland and has been a traditional meeting spot for day laborers who congregate there looking for work.

Minuteman Project National Rally Coordinator Robin Hvidston said she planned Saturday's protest in order "to bring awareness to the fact that employers were taking advantage of foreign national workers."

Employers who hire illegal immigrants are breaking the law and the Minuteman Project wants city officials to see "what is going on on their sidewalks," Hvidston said.
In 2003, the Rancho Cucamonga City Council approved the nonprofit TOUCH Outreach Ministries to operate a day-labor center near the intersection. But when the property owner decided to develop the land, the center was forced to close last summer.

Day laborers still gather in the vicinity seeking employment.

"It's true that there are problems when workers meet on the corner," said Jose Calderon, a sociology and Chicano studies professor at Pitzer College and president of the Latino-Latina Roundtable of San Gabriel and Pomona Valley.

"It brings forward the need to collaborate with other nonprofits and work with the community to develop a day-labor center where people can gather safely."
Mike Nava, a former Pomona Day Labor Center executive director, said he visits the site daily in an effort to keep the day laborers organized.
"We're trying to get them another (day-labor) center," he said.

Debbie McClay, a teacher in Orange County, said she provides English lessons to day laborers on Saturdays near the site.
"I feel really strongly that a center is important and something that we need to protect the workers," McClay said.

Will Downing, a Pomona College student who teaches a weekly English class on a sidewalk near the intersection, said day laborers provide a service for employers.
"We're here to confront the Minutemen and defend the (day laborers') right to petition work on the public's sidewalk," Downing said.
Upland resident Debra Bedoy said she was exercising her right as a U.S. citizen to protest against illegal immigrants.

"These people sneak in the back door and they cut in front of the line," Bedoy said. "I've talked to legal immigrants and every one of them is angry."
Gregg Acker, a manger at Lee Wise Garage, an auto repair shop near the intersection, said more than 50 day laborers gather daily within a two-block radius of his shop, "swamping the parking lot and blocking the driveway."

"My problem ... is loitering," he said.

Across the street, Arrow Grove Market manager Salim Samouh said the protest on Saturday had negatively affected business.
"When they see 100 people outside, they're not going to stop by," Samouh said.
"I feel sorry for the whole situation. It's not either side's problem. It's the government." of the white-supremacist group.
 

City, store to discuss day-laborer facility
By Nisha Gutierrez Staff Writer
Whittier Daily News

BALDWIN PARK -
The city plans to meet with Home Depot within the next two weeks to discuss building a day labor center in its parking lot.

Some Baldwin Park officials said they want a center built to protect residents from being solicited while shopping and to make sure laborers can seek employment from a safe area.

Councilwoman Marlen Garcia said in December she brought the day laborer issue to the council's attention after residents, many of whom are female, complained about day laborers urinating, sitting on cars, drinking, gambling and making offensive remarks to customers in the Home Depot parking lot.

Last month, the City Council voted unanimously to introduce a no-soliciting ordinance, which if approved would ban solicitation in areas intended for vehicular use, landscaped parkways and areas developed for pedestrian travel.

On Tuesday, the council voted 3-2 to put their decision on hold and send the ordinance back to city staff.

Garcia said she was stunned councilmen David Olivas and Ricardo Pacheco changed their position on the ordinance.

"Supposedly we'd be violating day laborers rights if we pass the ordinance, but at the same time if we don't our residents will continue to feel unsafe and uncomfortable," Garcia said.

Annabelle Gonzalves, spokeswoman for the Mexican American Legal Defense and Educational Fund, said if the city decides to approve the ordinance, the group would challenge it because the law would prevent people from exercising their First Amendment right to free speech and would violate the civil liberties of all residents.

The City Council is scheduled to meet with Home Depot on April 17 and expected to consider the ordinance again in May.

Ron DeFeo, spokesman for Home Depot, said the company does not operate or fund any day labor centers but does allow cities to use portions of its property for the facilities.

"While we prefer to maintain our policy of no soliciting at our stores, we have made the concessions on a few instances in order to serve the community but we do not operate them," DeFeo said.

Olivas said he hopes the city can build a day labor center and said he changed his position on the ordinance after realizing how broad it is.

"I thought the ordinance was too broad so much that it would include garage sales at private residences, it would affect people from the Salvation Army who stand in front of the stores and would keep people from having yard sales on their driveways," Olivas said.

nisha.gutierrez@sgvn.com

(626) 962-8811, Ext. 2109

http://www.whittierdailynews.com/news/ci_5612017

Minuteman group wants to shake racist image
By Sahra Susman, Staff Writer
Inland Valley Daily Bulletin
Article Launched:04/02/2007 11:12:07 PM PDT

Minuteman Project members are working on a policy that would provide identification cards to members in an effort to distance themselves from white supremacy and separatist groups.

Minuteman Project National Rally spokesman Raymond Herrera said his group does not associate with racist groups.

"Our policy as far as hate groups - be it the Nazis, the Ku Klux Klan or unruly Americans - is to not associate with them and distance ourselves from them. We are a multiethnic advocacy political group," Herrera said.

The group's move toward some kind of formal ID came in response to an incident Saturday at Arrow Highway and Grove Avenue in Rancho Cucamonga, where Minuteman members had planned to stage a rally against the use of illegal immigrant labor. Day laborers seeking work traditionally congregate at that intersection.

Robin Hvidston, Minuteman Project National Rally coordinator, said the rally was meant "to bring awareness to the fact that employers were taking advantage of foreign national workers."

Instead, the group was met by members of the White Legion Knights of the Ku Klux Klan from Yucaipa.

More than 100 day laborers and others also were there to counter the Minuteman rally.

The group of about 40 Minuteman Project members left shortly after the KKK appeared and have rescheduled their rally locally, though details have not been publicized.

Herrera, a Mexican-American from Victorville, said his group is taking steps to make sure groups like the KKK do not attend Minuteman Project rallies.

"We will never stand in the same street with hate groups - Nazis, KKK. If they show up, the rally is over. A similar situation won't happen again," Herrera said.

Herrera said ID cards will be used to ensure only Minuteman Project members attend rallies.

"Only our members will know about (them). We won't advertise or put it in the papers. We won't back down from the fight to save America because some hate group shows up."

Herrera said in order to be a member of the Minuteman Project, you have to be "qualified," which means you have to be "a moral American."

"You cannot be a bigot. We don't accept racists," he said.

Repeated calls to the KKK's national and regional headquarters were not returned.

Armando Navarro, professor of political science and ethnic studies at the UC Riverside, said the Minuteman's new policy is public-relations spin.

"I think what they're trying to do from a public relations perspective is ... trying to reconstruct their face as not racist," Navarro said.

Mike Nava, a community volunteer and former Pomona Day Labor Center executive director, said the fact Minuteman Project members are only seen protesting against Latinos makes their cause about race.

"They only attend protests that have to do with Mexican or Latino people ... you can immediately see that there is a significance of race there because you never see them protesting against any Jewish groups or Irish groups or veterans groups," Nava said.

"They always seem to be protesting against Latino and Mexican people."

Navarro said he believes the distance between the Minutemen and the KKK is not great.

"These people are ... more sophisticated, more middle class, not as violent," Navarro said. "But still (they're) directed at creating problems for the Mexican community."

Herrera maintained anyone is welcome to join his group.

"We're not an exclusive political group. We are mom and dad ... we're middle, moral America."

Staff writer Sahra Susman can be reached by e-mail at sahra.susman@dailybulletincom, or by phone at (909) 483-9356.



A man who identified himself as part of a Ku Klux Klan group from Yucaipa shouts at immigrant-rights supporters on Saturday in Rancho Cucamonga. The arrival of about 10 Klan members ended a protest against illegal immigration by Minuteman Project members who said they didn't want to be associated with the KKK. (Walter Richard Weis/Staff Photographer)
                                                                                     
 
 More Info: Day laborer sites and bill

BY BART JONES
bart.jones@newsday.com

April 1, 2007

THE SITES

THERE ARE AN ESTIMATED 63 formal day laborer hiring sites in the United States, from California to Texas to New Jersey. Usually, they are in parking lots where contractors can pull in and out easily. Many have some kind of structure such as a trailer or a building that includes a bathroom, and are run by an on-site coordinator.

Hiring sites typically open for business between 6 a.m. and 6:30 a.m. and stay open until at least noon. Many distribute jobs using a lottery system in which workers' names are randomly pulled out of a basket or tumbler.

Some centers also match workers' skills with employers' needs. If the contractor needs a roofer, for instance, and the first worker on the list lacks that skill, they move on to the next until the appropriate person is found. Some centers keep records listing employers' names to help prevent exploitation of workers. Most centers set a pay level of at least minimum wage and seek to protect workers' rights by tracking contractors who hire them.

Many centers offer activities for workers, such as English lessons and computer workshops, while they wait for work.

Supporters contend the centers get many of the men off the streets and improve the quality of life for all residents. Opponents say the centers foster illegal activity because many of the workers are undocumented immigrants and work off the books.

THE BILL

THE LATEST BIPARTISAN EFFORT at comprehensive national immigration reform was introduced on March 22 by Rep. Luis Gutierrez (D-Ill.) and Rep. Jeff Flake (R-Ariz.) It combines border and domestic enforcement with expanded visas and green cards for immigrants. President George W. Bush supports immigration reform, which some observers believe gives the measure some chance of passing.

The bill would increase border security by boosting the number of border patrol agents to 11,600, for instance, and the number of entry inspectors to 2,500. It also would set up an employment-verification system requiring employers to verify their employees' eligibility to work in the United States.

A new worker program also would be set up granting three-year, one-time renewable visas to workers filling jobs for which no U.S. workers can be found. The family- and employment-based immigration systems would be overhauled to reduce long backlogs at the federal Citizenship and Immigration Services. High-skilled workers would be permitted to come to and remain in the country.

Undocumented immigrants who pay a fine and pass extensive background checks would be eligible for conditional status with work and travel authorization for six years. If during the six years the worker remained employed, stayed out of trouble, learned English and civics, paid taxes and left the country and re-entered legally, he or she would be eligible for an adjusted status.
Copyright 2007 Newsday Inc.
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                          
 
Southampton to have day laborer hiring site

BY BART JONES
bart.jones@newsday.com

March 30, 2007, 9:34 PM EDT

The Village of Southampton will help establish the fourth formal hiring center for day laborers on Long Island, in a local spot where many workers gather waiting for employment, Mayor Mark Epley announced Friday.

Stepping into a controversy that has vexed numerous communities on the Island and across the nation, Epley said the village is in the process of creating the site on part of an empty lot next to the 7-Eleven store on North Sea Road and Aldrich Lane.

Friday, village workers planted trees around the outside of the site so motorists will not clearly see in. White spray paint marked the U-shaped path where gravel will be laid so contractors and homeowners can pull in to pick up workers.

Epley said the village plans to place benches and portable toilets on the site, but no trailer or building for now. The site should become operational within a week or so.

The village has become overwhelmed by as many as 150 day laborers who line streets including North Sea Road and Jobs Lane and sometimes even stand or lie down on people's front lawns, he said.

"I have them spread throughout my entire village now," Epley said. "I want to concentrate them in one spot."

His decision was met with praise and scorn. Sister Margaret Smyth, head of the Hispanic Apostolate for the North Fork who will help run the site, said, "It's an option. We have to do something because what exists is not working."

But Tom Wedell, a contractor from Southampton, called the project "ridiculous."

"I don't understand how they can put a hiring site for illegal immigrants when it's against the law to hire them." Wedell said.

Responding to the criticism, Epley said he was elected to resolve local problems.

"I'm not the IRS and I'm not the INS," he said, referring to the Internal Revenue Service and the former Immigration and Naturalization Service, whose functions now are carried out mostly by the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services in the Department of Homeland Security. "My responsibility is to my residents."

About 50 immigrants, clergy leaders and advocates held a vigil and march Friday through the streets of Southampton to voice support for immigrants -- and, indirectly, for the new hiring site.

Glen Cove, Freeport and Huntington Station already are home to formal hiring sites. Other communities, such as Farmingville, have grappled with the issue, with officials enacting a variety of measures such as crackdowns on contractors to try to drive the men off the streets.

Epley said he has spoken with groups on all sides of the debate -- from the local chapter of the Minuteman Project, who oppose illegal immigration, to Roman Catholic nuns -- and has concluded a hiring site was the only viable option.

The mayor just returned from a trip to Jupiter, Fla., which he paid for with his own funds, to visit a hiring site there he thought could serve as a model for Southampton.

The village is hoping to enact an anti-solicitation ordinance based on one adopted in Jupiter that would help prevent the men from waiting for work on public rights of way.

The mayor said he is seeking donations to help pay for the trees and the gravel at the site. Beyond that, he said, the village will spend little on the project.

Volunteers at the local Coalition for a Worklink Center, who have pushed for a hiring site, have approached the Metropolitan Transportation Authority to seek permission to establish a more permanent site, which could include a trailer or a building, in the parking lot of the Southampton Long Island Rail Road station. The MTA has not responded, group members said.
Copyright 2007 Newsday Inc.
 
 
 
Judge Backs Town
Anti-solicitation ordinance upheld.
By Scott J. Krischke
March 28, 2007

Members of Herndon's Town Council have remained firm in their plans to change operators of the town's day labor site following a ruling last week by a Fairfax County General District Court judge that upheld the town's ordinance forbidding informal employment solicitations.

The ruling was in response to the first challenge to Herndon's anti-solicitation ordinance, which was passed by the former Town Council along with the creation of the day labor site in late 2005, to manage what the town called a public safety issue regarding workers on the street and in private parking lots.

Defendant Stephen Thomas, who was arrested by the Herndon Police Department for violation of the ordinance on Elden Street on Sept. 16 was found guilty of the Class II misdemeanor and fined $100. Thomas was cited by Herndon Police after he asked a man at a 7-Eleven on the 1100 block of Elden Street for help doing yard work, according to court records. Several calls made to Thomas's attorneys at the Fairfax-based law firm Leffler & Hyland were not returned.

Thomas's attorney, Alexa Mosley, had argued that the ordinance was unconstitutional, as it impeded his right to free speech, guaranteed by the first amendment.

In her ruling, Judge Lorraine Nordlund stated that the ordinance met constitutional free speech requirements in that it was narrow enough as to not impede broader free speech, reflected needs for secondary public safety effects and that the speech was still legally regulated at the town's organized day labor site.

A similar ordinance passed in Redondo Beach, Calif., a Los Angeles suburb, was repealed last year after a federal judge ruled it unconstitutional.

"The very fact that [the day labor site] exists could be one of the strongest reasons for upholding this ordinance," Nordlund said at the conclusion of her ruling. "If it was not for the town's [day labor] center, I would have had to strike this ordinance."

THE RULING TO uphold the anti-solicitation ordinance is a confidence booster for Vice Mayor Dennis Husch, who said that his desire to change the town's current day labor site operator to one that would check for legal work authorization status is as strong as ever.

The town's current day labor operator, Reston-based non-profit Project Hope & Harmony, has refused to check for work authorization status as they have stated that it is not in their legal right to do.

Herndon's Town Council issued in January a request for proposals to operators who would check work authorization status. That went unanswered, with some companies citing a lack of perceived profit, according to town reports. They are working to refine the request to make it more attractive, Husch said.

The town's current day labor site has long been cited by attorneys as being the main reason that the ordinance has been upheld.

For Husch, so long as there is a site that provides a place for workers to go to solicit employment freely, regardless of whether or not it checks for work authorization status, the ordinance can be upheld.

"No one has said that we're going to get rid of the site, we just plan on finding an operator that will check work authorization status," Husch said. "We have no responsibility to serve illegal aliens and I feel confident that her ruling would remain the same," provided a new site was introduced and the current one closed.

Calls made to Mayor Steve DeBenedittis, who was present during the ruling, were not returned.

BUT THE RULING may not remain the same if the site is changed, as it would then prohibit the right to free speech of a certain group of people, according to attorney and former Mayor Mike O'Reilly, whose council passed the ordinance.

"I don't think that there's any question that if the regulated site is not open to everyone to exercise their free speech rights that this ordinance would be overturned," O'Reilly said. "Even if [workers] don't have documents they still have basic constitutional rights … and there cannot be laws passed that prohibit them."

Since the town cannot enforce federal immigration law, the question is about whether or not workers, regardless of their immigration status, are allowed to solicit employment on the street. As the current day labor site provides a regulated method for soliciting work for everyone, the ordinance can be upheld constitutionally, according to O'Reilly. The legal challenges to that ordinance gain more credence when that site is changed or closed to certain groups, he said.

"Like it or not, illegal aliens have [constitutional] rights … just on the virtue of their presence in this country," O'Reilly said. "Frankly this was a very close case … and I think that if that site didn't exist the way it does now, you would be looking at the very strong possibility of the ordinance being overturned."


NEWS
August 10, 2005
Beyond the Stereotypes

Members of Herndon's day worker population want to be known for more than standing on a street corner.
By Brynn Grimley
Herndon Connection


Jose Hernandez wakes up every morning at 4:30 a.m. As the sun begins to rise, he begins his walk to the 7-Eleven at the corner of Alabama Drive and Elden Street, hoping to find work for the day.

If hired, Hernandez will work close to 10 hours of manual labor in a day, making $10 an hour. When his job at the construction site ends, Hernandez returns home to take a quick shower, grab a bite to eat, and hop on a bus to his part-time job in Reston Town Center where he cleans offices for $6.50 an hour until 10 p.m.

On days he does not find a day job at the 7-Eleven, Hernandez begins to feel the pressure of financial burdens — so does his family.
A native of El Salvador, Hernandez has four sons, twin 7-year-olds, a 9-year-old and 11-year-old, along with a wife, sister and mother in his home country. Each month he sends $600 or more home to them, $350 for his wife and children and $250 to his sister and mother who help watch the children.

"The big pressure's at the end of the month when you have to come up with rent," said the soft-spoken 30-year-old through translation by Jorge Rochac.

Hernandez, wearing workman boots, gray cargo pants, a black bandanna as a sweat band around his forehead and a navy t-shirt that lists "California's Beaches" across it, stands a little under six feet tall. He looks away as he talks about the life he left more than a year ago to come to the United States where he is trying to pay off his debts so he can return home.

"It's very hard to be away from one's family, especially your children and your wife," he said of the family he hasn't seen for 13 months and speaks to once a week via telephone.

"The United States are known as the 'Golden Jail.' If you're here you can't go back," he said. "You're gone three, six, nine months, sometimes your loved ones die and you never see them. Since I have been here I have lost two close relatives."

A majority of the men circled around Hernandez could relate as he told his story of leaving school after the sixth grade to become a trash collector in El Salvador.

Many of them tell their slightly differing tales of family back home and why they chose to come to the United States — most of them because relatives live here.

The common denominator for all of them is opportunity — something their home countries did not offer.

"What really is happening, what in a sense made us come here, is the insecurity and delinquency of our own country," said El Salvadorian native Jose-Luis Saravia, through a translator. "Here we don't have to deal with that."

Saravia has been in the United States for two years, but came to Herndon 10 months ago because his relatives live here. Initially living in Florida, his trip to Virginia took a detour.

Saravia said he was kidnapped for seven months by the person who offered to help him get to Herndon. He was held with seven other workers in the "boondocks somewhere" forced to do agricultural work for $40 a day. Threatened with abuse on a regular basis, one night Saravia said he escaped and "just ran away."

At 22 years old, Saravia is not the youngest man on site. Francisco, who declined an interview due to legal concerns, is 15 years old.
Kandi Perdomo, an English as a second language teacher at the Neighborhood Resource Center, said Francisco came to the United States by himself from El Salvador. Unable to attend school because he is supporting himself, Perdomo said Francisco stands at the 7-Eleven every day hoping for work.

Perdomo has met children younger than Francisco in the country alone. She also has heard repeated stories about men not paid for their labor.

"There's about $2,000 to $3,000 that I haven't been paid," said Saravia. "A lot of guys [employers] that don't pay say that if you don't have papers you don't have protection — that's not true, that's a perception."

Sometimes employers will try to take advantage of Latino day workers because they do not speak English fluently, resulting in them working all day for no pay, he said.

If hired every day, he will make $500-plus a week, said Saravia. He added that as of Wednesday, Aug. 3, he had not worked in three days.

"HERE IT IS AN ADVENTURE," said Hernandez. "Some days there is work, some days there is not work. And some days, like today, you just stand around and that's when people misperceive us and think we're just a bunch of bums standing on a corner doing nothing."
Hernandez said if he had the opportunity for a stable, full-time job, he would take it, even if it paid $7 an hour.

"When an American picks us up for work, we do our best," he said. "We want them to have a good concept of who we are and what we do."

Nery Vargas, 25, nicknamed "The Teacher" by the men on site, said there is a misconception in the community about the men that gather at the 7-Eleven.

"Those who are here, we're here because we really want to work, we want to contribute something," said the Honduran native. "We come here to work, not to cause problems. Our contribution is our work in exchange for pay."

Before moving to the United States, Vargas was studying mathematics at a university in Honduras. He left after one year to come to the United States as a "tourist" to see what the country had to offer. Since then he has worked as an electrician, placing his wages in a savings account, while also teaching himself English and helping others adjust to the new culture.

Vargas has also spoken on behalf of the day workers at recent Planning Commission public hearings regarding a proposal for the creation of a formal, regulated day labor site in town.

"Who will speak for us if I don't?" said Vargas, adding it is important residents understand the workers are as unhappy with the current situation at 7-Eleven as anybody else.

"When someone comes and they need someone like a mechanic or a painter, there's no way for them to pick and choose," said Vargas.

"The big problem is that there is no order. There is no way people coming into the site have people they can speak to and people on the site have no way to speak to the [employers]."

Saravia added there is also a misperception among residents that stereotypes them as bad people.

"For us, it would be a beautiful thing to take a photo of the drunks who come here and print it in the newspaper so we can get rid of them," said Saravia. "It would be good to get those people in the paper and prosecute them, so the general public opinion would change — it's not us."

Hernandez, Vargas and Saravia will continue to wait for work at the 7-Eleven because financially they have no other option.

Hernandez said he wants to take English classes, but cannot because of cost and scheduling conflicts. If the formal day-labor site is approved and offers English classes as proposed in the application, Hernandez said he would definitely attend.

Until then, he will continue to pay his debts from coming to the United States — a $6,800 trip that is gaining interest at 12 percent each month until he pays it off — and sending money home to his family. "I am living the American dream to get ahead and get rid of all my debts," he said.

"I am saving $30,000 and then I will go home to my country," Vargas added as a grin spread across his face under a black leather cowboy hat.

"I'll finish my studies and work as a math teacher," said Vargas about his plan to leave in a year-and-a-half. "But, for now, it's good to be here for work."

Even with a large debt hanging over his head, bills and rent to pay and a family to support each month, Hernandez smiles as he thinks about the future.

"My major goal someday — hopefully not too far away — is, I hope to go back home," he said. "I think that is the dream of most of us, to go back home."

[Jorge Rochac, a 16-year resident of Herndon, contributed to this story by helping translate for the men at the unofficial day-labor site

 

 



August 15, 2005 Invisible to Most, Immigrant Women Line Up for Day Labor
By NINA BERNSTEIN
New York Times

The women are not noticed by the weekday morning crowds that rush past Eighth Avenue and 37th Street, in the heart of Manhattan's fashion district. They arrive in twos and threes after 8 a.m., shrinking against the buildings on both sides of the avenue, until scores of them are waiting, small, dark-haired Mexicans, Ecuadoreans, Hondurans.

By noon they have vanished. In swift, discreet sidewalk negotiations, perhaps half have been hired for a day's work at the minimum wage or less in some of the neighborhood's last struggling garment factories. The rest have given up until tomorrow.

A few miles away in Williamsburg, commuters on the busy Brooklyn-Queens Expressway are equally oblivious to the similar scene unfolding on an overpass above them. There, the work at stake is $8-an-hour housecleaning, and those vying for a day's scrubbing, mainly for Hasidic homemakers, stand in a crude ascending hierarchy of employer preference: Mexican and Central American women in their 30's at the back, Polish immigrant women in their 50's and 60's in the middle, and young Polish students with a command of English at the head of the line.

At a time when male day laborers have become the most public and contentious face of economic immigration to the United States, these two rare female shape-ups have doubled in size almost unobserved in recent years. Their growth reflects a larger overlooked reality: Women make up 44 percent of the nation's low-wage immigrant work force, and worldwide, studies show, more and more women are migrating for work.

Often invisible and undercounted, experts say, female economic migrants are an increasing presence, especially in big cities like New York, where the demand is not for men to pick lettuce or process poultry, but for women to pick up the scraps of a collapsed manufacturing sector, or to serve in the vast underground economy of domestic service.

Although more women across the country are showing up in day-labor hiring halls, often run by grass-roots labor groups, experts say that these two female shape-ups may well be the only significant ones of their kind in the nation - places where women are willing to put their personal safety in jeopardy for a few hours of work.

"What else is there to do if you have nothing to eat?" asked Rosario Jocha, 49, still standing on Eighth Avenue at 11 a.m. on a recent Wednesday. She said she had recently grabbed a day's work cutting threads from jackets even when the employer, a Chinese immigrant subcontractor, insisted he could not pay more than $5.75 an hour, 25 cents below the state minimum wage. "I've been here 11 years, and I still haven't found a stable, steady job."

At both locations, some of the women waiting for work had been in the country as little as a few months; others, like Ms. Jocha, a Queens resident from Ecuador, were old-timers who spoke of better jobs lost when small-business employers could not pay rising rent. On Eighth Avenue, merchants said that 100 to 150 women regularly sought work six mornings a week year round - double or triple the number when the intersection first emerged as an informal female hiring site about six years ago.

Yet May Chen, a vice president of Unite, the garment workers' union, whose headquarters is only a dozen blocks away, said she was unaware of the shape-up's existence until she was asked about it for this article. And Aaron Adams, a veteran garment center landlord who passes by every day, said he had assumed the women standing there "were just shooting the breeze."

Rhacel Salazar Parreñas, a sociologist who has written extensively about the feminization of migration, said she was not surprised. "The space that these women occupy, the public sp